Blog

What is the dominant worldview and what are the supporting worldviews in this article?

"Why We Should Let Go of the Idea of a Perfect Self"

We’ve been sold a lie for decades: that deep down, there’s some “true self” we’re supposed to uncover — a hidden blueprint of who we’re meant to become. The self-help industry thrives on this myth, feeding us the illusion that our lives will fall into place once we “find ourselves.” But what if the self isn’t a fixed essence, but a fluid process?

Biology, psychology, and neuroscience all point to the same truth: what we call the “self” is really a bundle of habits, reactions, memories, and social interactions. It’s not a crystal at the center of your being; it’s a shifting pattern that changes depending on the context. The idea of a stable “me” is comforting — but it’s also misleading.

Instead of clinging to authenticity like it’s a golden ticket, maybe we should embrace the idea that we’re made to adapt, to shift, to reinvent. There’s no shame in not being “true to yourself” if that self never actually existed. You are the story you tell, and that story can change.

This isn’t nihilism — it’s freedom. If there is no fixed self, then there is no final standard to live up to. You are not a failure for not becoming your “ideal self,” because that ideal was always a projection. Life becomes less about perfection and more about participation — in relationships, in culture, in shaping the future.

Let’s stop obsessing over finding our “true nature” and start cultivating flexibility, responsiveness, and self-awareness. The goal isn’t to be authentic — it’s to be alive to the moment, and honest about the parts of ourselves we’re still inventing.

Worldview Analysis

Dynamism is the dominant worldview, and it's drawing on others (Materialism, Psychism, and Idealism) to make its case.

Let’s walk through the text and unpack how each worldview plays a role, and why Dynamism sits at the center.

Dominant Worldview: Dynamism

"What we call the 'self' is really a bundle of habits, reactions, memories, and social interactions."

"It’s a shifting pattern that changes depending on context."

🔹 Dynamism’s Essence:

• Reality is not built on static substances, but on forces, processes, and movements.

• The self is not an entity, but a field of dynamic interactions — always in motion, always in formation.

 In This Article:

• The entire argument orbits around the idea that the self is not a fixed thing, but a process in flux.

• It opposes all static definitions of identity.

• Even freedom is redefined as release from fixity — that is, from Idealism’s fixed inner ideal or Monadism’s stable individuality.

Conclusion: Dynamism is the "backbone" — the worldview structuring how the self, life, and freedom are conceived.

Supporting Worldview: Materialism

"Biology, psychology, and neuroscience all point to the same truth…"

🔹 Materialism’s Role:

• The appeal to science and physicalist language grounds the argument in physiological and observable processes.

• Reinforces the claim that the self isn’t metaphysical or spiritual, but built out of material and social conditions.

Used rhetorically to undermine idealized or spiritual concepts of the self.

Supporting Worldview: Psychism

"…a bundle of habits, reactions, memories, and social interactions."

🔹 Psychism’s Role:

• The self is also shown as a psychological construct, shaped by emotion, memory, and relational dynamics.

• It’s not just biology — it’s also the inner experience and soul-life, but treated as fluid and conditioned, not eternal or deep in essence.

Adds human texture to the reduction — makes the shift more existential, less coldly scientific.

Supporting Worldview: Idealism (Critiqued)

"You are not a failure for not becoming your ‘ideal self,’ because that ideal was always a projection."

🔹 Idealism’s Role:

• It's criticized, not endorsed.

• The article pushes against the Idealist assumption that a true self exists as an inner moral or spiritual idea we must strive toward.

• The so-called ideal is dismissed as a projection, a fiction.

 Idealism is present as a foil — a view to be overcome.

Summary Table:

Final Reflection

What’s powerful here is that the style of freedom being promoted — not “freedom to be who you are,” but “freedom from being someone fixed” — is itself a dynamic, anti-essentialist gesture. That's pure Dynamism, carried through both content and rhetorical force.